So, I had done this big painting and turned it in. I had a couple more character designs to do for author Dady Johnson eventually, before we parted ways. This was all, for reference, basically a year ago.
When I originally submitted my sketch, there were two forms of it--the form we saw last week, and a second version which featured a shattered stained glass. You'd be able to see that the main figure had himself been painted on the glass in the same pose, but with the reality appearing, the symbolic/prophetic passes away. I thought that I'd also include the heads of the various bad guys within the stained glass, to include them on the cover.
My client considered them both and went for the straight-up figure, which I went ahead and painted, as discussed last week.
I really liked the stained glass idea, though. So, I began to get back to work on the piece immediately after finishing it, although now this was purely a studio project which meant it wasn't going to pay any further, and so it was relegated to when there was time. From the beginning of working on the painting I suspected I might want to do this, and by the end, I was happy enough that I was sold. I thought a bit about how to do it. After all, there was a completed painting here already!
I wish I had taken some process shots of what I did. Chalk it up to working in bits between things. I printed out my scan, small, and laid tracing paper over it. I "posterized" the forms of the figure as they might be simplified for stained glass. Then I created a decorative frame around the whole thing, grabbing and mixing motifs from various old medieval stained glass windows. His flowing thick robe down below breaks frame in the stained glass version. Then, having done this I scanned it and overlaid it on the painting scan in Photoshop. I then "broke the glass" digitally, erasing out bits of it, trying to find a balance that would leave enough of the main original figure, while also having enough of an indication of the image on the glass so an astute viewer could figure it out with a little work.
Next, I printed it out actual size on multiple sheets of 12x18" paper, taped them together, and laid it on top of my painting. I used a traditional conte rub-down and traced down the total silhouette of the window--no details yet.
I had this finished piece, and had used retouch varnish on it for scanning, on purpose. Retouch is a thinner, more dilute varnish that helps to freshen the color some, but still allows you to paint over it, and the paint will still bond correctly. So, I was able to continue painting.Now, not knowing exactly how this was going to turn out, I painted the entire area that would be the stained glass back to white. I used 2-3 coats of alkyd white and obliterated about half of my painting, permanently. It was incredibly difficult to do, psychologically, but was necessary; to get the pure color of stained glass required a white base again. I couldn't just paint on top of the darker colors.
It stayed like that, all white, for days. Having purposefully ruined my painting, there was nothing to do but move forward and improve it!
I digitally recreated what it looked like here, while in that state. I envy my digital brethren now. Putting down that white layer took a few minutes in Photoshop. To get the painting like this probably took a full day, with the multiple coats. And this was necessary to simply begin.
So because there are no process shots, you'll have to see the final, then re-read those last couple of paragraphs to get what I meant. I'll post the two side-by-side so you can compare:
Step 1: Do a full painting Step 2: Do another painting on top
Easy!
Easy!
Once the white had cured, I then flipped my stained glass print-out over again and traced down the decoration. From there I worked with pure color, thinly, allowing it to function as glazes to retain the luminosity of the white. I was really happy with the effect. Right around this time, my wife and I took a walk on the newly-expanded High Line Park here in NYC, a walking park built onto abandoned elevated railways. Very cool. It travels at about the 3rd-story level of buildings, which are quite close to it. One of them is a church, and so we were able to stand right outside the stained glass high above the altar (if viewed from the inside), only we were standing outside. Great timing. I was able to better see the structure and shape of the lead framing that surrounds all these little cells of colored glass. I've never made stained glass before, so I had to kind of give myself a quick crash course in studying images--again, all online--to figure out some of the ways stained glass is formed using these lead supports for smaller cut pieces of glass, since no stained glass window is all one piece. I snapped some photos. After we finished our walk, we back-tracked and went in and looked at them from inside. I noticed something I had overlooked before: dust. Dust around the edges of each cell, collecting on the bottoms especially. Of course--I'd noticed this when I painted Rorschach a few years earlier, as a way of making glass look believable. When you clean glass, it's hard to clean the very edges, so dust collects there. paint that and you add a lot of illusion. I used that tip again in Krallenhorde Wantons. So I went home, added that layer of detail, and called it a day.
Whew.
There is a reason I've tried to work larger lately when I can: I'm just better, bigger. In this case, as in many cases, I went well beyond what was reasonable for the fee allotted, by choice. Creating good paintings is often an exercise in making one's self poor.
Though the e-Book with the original cover was for just came out recently, I exhibited the painting last November at IlluXCon. My efforts began to pay off, and I received many kind compliments which made my day. A couple were surprisingly flattering. The incredible Raoul Vitale, whose work I'd admired for a few years but hadn't really talked to (even at past IlluXCons--it's a busy show), stopped by and really scrutinized it. The guy is a powerhouse painter, so I just waited for him to say something. He had very nice things to say, but in particular he told me that he'd spent years working in stained glass, in the past. So he was very interested in that aspect of it, in particular. I told him I had not, and so I was sure that I'd made lots of errors in the handling of how the lead framing and glass-shaping would actually work. He assured me that I had done a surprisingly good job of it, and pointed out the couple of places where the framing would have run differently, for technical reasons. It was a great conversation, and really improved my confidence in the piece quite a lot more!
And now the painting is actually done. The painting, from sketch to second-final, took a month. If only I could always give every project a month! You can see more detail and information here.
And now the painting is actually done. The painting, from sketch to second-final, took a month. If only I could always give every project a month! You can see more detail and information here.

Secondly there are some characters--fictional or otherwise--that are intimidating to illustrate, simply because of their fame, or how often they've been portrayed. Gandalf. Romeo and Juliet. George Washington. Alfred E. Newman. But the Eternal Son of God Almighty, Himself? Yeah, that alone almost put me off the project, to be honest.
These are not meant to be "historical" depictions. They are meant to comfort, so need to be comfortable. I get it, I'm just not a fan. If I ever did one, it would probably offend more than anything. Hair somewhat oily and dusty, the scarred and calloused hands of a carpenter. Swarthy, sun-lined skin, giving the appearance of one far older than his thirty-odd years. Dusty feet and legs. Bad teeth. Middle-Eastern visage.


